Katapult

The Employment and Labor Law Dispatcher

LinkedIn

Bryan T. Symes - Attorney - Ruder Ware, L.L.S.C.

Topics: Fleet Operations

Bryan represents management-side clients in the areas of employment and labor law and provides counseling and litigation services associated with such substantive topics as employment compliance matters, employment practices policies and discrimination.

E-mail: bsymes@ruderware.com | Website: www.ruderware.com | legal disclaimer

Close

Legal Disclaimer

The Employment and Labor Law Dispatcher Blog is made available by Ruder Ware to provide a general understanding of some of the legal issues relating to the transportation industry. This site does not provide specific legal advice and you should not use the information contained on this site to address your specific situation without consulting with legal counsel that is well versed in employment and labor laws and regulations. By using the Employment and Labor Law Dispatcher Blog site you understand that there is no attorney client relationship between you and Ruder Ware or any individual attorney. Postings on this site do not represent the views of our clients. This site may link to other information resources on the Internet. These sites are not endorsed or supported by Ruder Ware, and Ruder Ware does not vouch for the accuracy or reliability of any information provided therein.

Please do not send any confidential information to anyone at the firm before an attorney-client relationship is formally established. Any email communication submitted in response to this blog will not be considered confidential and will not be protected from disclosure by attorney-client privilege.

For further information regarding the articles on this blog, contact Ruder Ware through our primary website. www.ruderware.com

Motor Carrier’s “100% Healed” Policy Does Not Give Rise to Per Se Disability Discrimination Under Prior Regulatory Scheme

Recently, the federal U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit (which has jurisdiction over Wisconsin, Illinois and Indiana) opined that a motor carrier’s “100% healed” policy—through which the carrier insisted that its employees be “100% healed” following medical leaves of absence, does not necessarily support employee claims under the federal Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”). The case is Powers v. USF Holland, Inc., Case No. 10-2363 (7th Cir. 2011).... Read More

Proposed Driver Fatigue Prevention Act Would Entitle Over-the-Road Bus Drivers to Overtime Compensation

Recently, legislation at the federal level was introduced that, if ultimately passed, is designed to carve out over-the-road bus drivers from the so-called "Motor Carrier Act exemption" from the Fair Labor Standards Act's overtime compensation provisions.

The legislation can be found here.... Read More

Driver's Failure to Communicate and Refusal to Return Keys to Truck Overcomes Alleged Protected Activity Under Whistleblower Act

Recently, the Administrative Review Board (which issues final agency decisions for the Secretary of Labor in cases arising under a wide range of worker protection laws, including the Surface Transportation Assistance Act) ruled in favor of a motor carrier that allegedly terminated the employment of one of its drivers in retaliation for complaining about unsafe working conditions. The case is Israel v. Schneider National Carriers, Inc., ARB Case No. 09-115.... Read More

Federal Law Preempts One State's Rest and Meal Break Laws

Recently, a federal district court in California determined that motor carriers that transport property are not subject to California's meal and rest break laws, reasoning such laws are preempted by the Federal Aviation Administration Authorization Act ("FAAAA"). For those interested, the case is Dilts v. Penske Logistics, LLC, 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 122421 (S.D. Cal. Oct. 19, 2011).... Read More

NLRB Approves Noteworthy Changes to Representation Election Rules

At a public meeting held on November 30, 2011, the National Labor Relations Board ("Board") voted, 2-to-1, in favor of a resolution to adopt six procedural amendments to the rules governing representation elections under the National Labor Relations Act ("NLRA") (although the Board's resolution did not include all portions of the proposed amendments contained in the June 2011 Notice of Proposed Rulemaking). Not surprisingly, the procedural changes adopted through the November 30, 2011 resolution will expedite the "representation election" process, to the detriment of employers.... Read More

NLRB Expresses Another Employee-Friendly Equation: Employer's Lockout of Employees + NLRB = Reemployment of Employees

In Douglas Autotech Corp., 357 NLRB No. 111 (Nov. 18, 2011), a 2-1 majority of the National Labor Relations Board (“Board”) opined that a company “reemployed” illegal strikers who attempted to return to work, when the company informed these illegal strikers they were “locked out.” In Douglas Autotech Corp., the United Auto Workers Local 822 (“UAW”) represented a bargaining unit of 146 employees at Douglas Autotech’s Bronson, Michigan facility.... Read More

NLRB Schedules Vote on Portion of Proposed Changes to Election Rules

Through my September 7, 2011 blog post, I described the National Labor Relations Board’s ("NLRB") proposed "quickie election" rules designed to make unionization easier.... Read More

Prohibiting Religious Apologetics In The Workplace May Violate Title VII

Under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 ("Title VII"), which prohibits workplace discrimination based on several "protected classes," including religion, employers have a duty to accommodate the sincerely-held religious beliefs of employees, where employers know about such religious beliefs, such religious beliefs conflict with employment requirements, and accommodating such religious beliefs does not create "undue hardship." In Weathers v. FedEx Corporate Services, Inc., No. 09 C 5493, 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 125880 (N.D. Ill., Nov.... Read More

Employer’s Failure to Return Employee’s Telephone Calls Puts Employer Through The “Ringer” - Dials Up Retaliation Claim

Recently, another cautionary tale caught my eye—this one illustrates the significant consequences that can flow from an employer’s failure to take seemingly insignificant actions. The case is Hofferica v. St. Mary Med. Ctr., No. 10-6026, 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 106844 (E.D. Pa. Sept. 20, 2011).... Read More

National Labor Relations Board Postpones Implementation Date For New Notice-Posting Rule

Yesterday, October 5, 2011, the National Labor Relations Board’s (“Board”) Office of Public Affairs announced that the Board has elected to postpone the implementation of its new “Final Rule” requiring employers to notify employees of their rights under the National Labor Relations Act. Under the new rule, which was to become effective on November 14, 2011, private-sector employers whose workplaces fall under the National Labor Relations Act would have been be required to conspicuously post the employee rights notice [an 11-by-17 inch poster] where other workplace notices are typically posted—including on intranet or internal sites if workplace rules and policies are customarily posted there.... Read More